Contract law is the foundation of civilization, yet Tyrie Boyer believes that he can unilaterally reinterpret a contract so that one side has only obligations and no rights. By enforcing only one side of a contract Tyrie Boyer shows his ignorance not just of family law, but contract law as well. Since at least the Code of Hammurabi people have understood the importance of being able to depend on an agreement, Tyrie Boyer disagrees. A Judge that won’t enforce an agreement is a disgrace to the bench, he damages not just his own reputation but that of law in general.
Studies have shown that the most confident of people This is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. Wikipedia defines it this way:
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias manifesting in two principal ways: unskilled individuals tend to suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate, while highly skilled individuals tend to rate their ability lower than is accurate.
Judge Tyrie Boyer is a perfect example of this. Supremely confident, yet supremely uninformed, Judge Boyer makes a dangerous composition. Boyer makes rulings without having read the pleading, blocks information for years, and then allows it later when he has already ruled, and in general
To make matters worse, [Read more…]
The IRS may have inadvertently figured out how to win its legal battles against aggrieved tea party groups: Give them what they wanted in the first place — tax-exempt status.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) stated: “You get targeted and harassed for three years but, oh, because you finally get [tax-exempt status], the three years of harassment doesn’t mean anything? find that argument lacking tremendously in light of what these people went through.”
Judge Tyrie Boyer will go out of his way to schedule unneeded hearings regarding money – even when it has been resolved among the parties – and yet will delay for years in enforcing an entire agreement and do gymnastics to attempt to do so. What is it about money that seems to motivate this Judge? Why does he value money more than children when he is a family law judge?
When you have an apparent mental midget for a judge, these are the types of rulings you get.
edit: After Judge Tyrie Boyer scheduled a hearing (that was unneeded as it had been handled previously by the attorneys) on money, he still hasn’t gone ahead and scheduled anything regarding children more than half a year later. Why does Tyrie Boyer think that money is more important than children? What kind of character do you have if you are supposed to be a family law judge and yet prioritize this way?
Others have accused Boyer of “trying to buy a judicial seat because Boyer has put $150,000 of his own money into his campaign account”. Was it about money and power for Boyer instead of enforcing agreements and putting children welfare first? We don’t know, but we do know that in cases before him his actions show him putting money before children.
In Judge Tyrie Boyers courtroom, a document that says something clear appears to be treated as optional:
…If any of the children spend overnight in a place other than their usual place of abode, it is the obligation of the parent who is in charge of them at the time to provide to the other parent the address and telephone number…
Judge Boyer appears to not care what the parties have agreed to, and has the apparent unprofessionalism to ignore the law to enforce his own views.
We wonder how clowns like this are Judges?